Vincent Jerome Camarda (CRD #2463703) Was Suspended by FINRA

Vincent Jerome Camarda (CRD #2463703) has been the subject of disclosure events reported on his FINRA BrokerCheck record. According to his BrokerCheck report, Vincent Camarda is not currently registered and has reported disclosures that include 8 regulatory events, 27 customer disputes, 1 termination, and 1 civil event. If you have worked with Vincent Jerome Camarda and you have concerns about his activity, keep reading.

BrokerCheck link: FINRA BrokerCheck Profile

BrokerCheck report: BrokerCheck Report (PDF)

Regulatory action (FINRA)

According to Vincent Camarda’s FINRA BrokerCheck disclosure summary, FINRA reported regulatory actions in which Vincent Camarda was suspended after FINRA alleged he failed to comply with an arbitration award or settlement agreement and/or failed to satisfactorily respond to a FINRA request for information concerning the status of compliance. BrokerCheck reflects 8 total regulatory events for Vincent Camarda; two recent examples are below.

Example 1 (Final): Vincent Camarda FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects a FINRA letter dated December 2, 2025. BrokerCheck states FINRA alleged Vincent Camarda failed to comply with an arbitration award or settlement agreement or to satisfactorily respond to a FINRA request to provide information concerning the status of compliance, resulting in a suspension.

Example 2 (Final): Vincent Camarda FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects a FINRA letter with a resolution date of October 16, 2025. BrokerCheck states FINRA alleged Vincent Camarda failed to comply with an arbitration award or settlement agreement or to satisfactorily respond to a FINRA request regarding compliance; the sanction ordered was an indefinite suspension beginning October 16, 2025.

In addition to the two examples above, BrokerCheck reflects 6 other regulatory events reported for Vincent Camarda.

Rule summary #1: FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability)

FINRA Rule 2111 generally requires that a broker-dealer or associated person have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving securities is suitable for the customer based on the customer’s investment profile. This rule is often cited in customer disputes involving unsuitable or overly risky recommendations.

Rule summary #2: FINRA Rule 3110 (Supervision)

FINRA Rule 3110 requires firms to establish and maintain a supervisory system and written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and FINRA rules. Supervision failures frequently appear in customer complaints where investors allege that a firm failed to supervise a broker’s recommendations or outside activities.

Investor disputes / customer complaints

Vincent Camarda’s FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects 27 customer dispute disclosures. Below are two examples; BrokerCheck reflects 25 additional customer dispute disclosures beyond these examples.

Example 1 (Pending): Vincent Camarda FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects a written customer complaint received July 31, 2025. The customer alleged negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, failure to supervise, and selling away in connection with a promissory note, with alleged damages of $182,000. The matter is reported as pending.

Example 2 (Award): Vincent Camarda FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects a FINRA arbitration (Case #24-01241) that resulted in an award dated August 22, 2025. The disposition reflects monetary compensation of $1,323,078, and BrokerCheck includes a statement that the award had not been paid by or on behalf of Vincent Camarda as of October 16, 2025.

Employment separation

Vincent Camarda FINRA BrokerCheck report reflects that he was permitted to resign from IBN Financial Services, Inc. on June 17, 2022. BrokerCheck describes allegations of unlawfully offering and selling securities in connection with a more than $500 million unregistered fraudulent offering with lending company Complete Business Solutions Group Inc. (d/b/a Par Funding).

Why this matters to investors (Regulation Best Interest)

Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) is a U.S. securities regulation designed to strengthen the standard of conduct that broker-dealers owe to retail investors when making recommendations about securities transactions or investment strategies. Adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and effective as of June 30, 2020, Reg BI aims to enhance investor protection while preserving investor access to brokerage products and services.

Reg BI requires broker-dealers and financial advisors to act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time a recommendation is made, and not to place their own financial or other interests ahead of the customer’s. This represents a higher standard than the historical “suitability” requirement, which only required that recommendations be suitable, not necessarily optimal or conflict-free.

Reg BI is built around four key obligations:

1. Disclosure Obligation – Broker-dealers must disclose material facts about the relationship and recommendations, including fees, scope of services, and conflicts of interest.
2. Care Obligation – Recommendations must be made with reasonable diligence, care, and skill, considering costs, risks, and alternatives.
3. Conflict of Interest Obligation – Firms must identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate conflicts, particularly those that create incentives to favor one product over another.
4. Compliance Obligation – Firms must establish policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with Reg BI as a whole.

Importantly, Reg BI applies at the recommendation level, not as a continuous duty like the fiduciary standard applicable to registered investment advisers. Still, it significantly narrows the gap by emphasizing cost considerations, conflict management, and investor-focused decision-making.

Overall, Regulation Best Interest seeks to promote transparency, improve the quality of investment recommendations, and reinforce trust between retail investors and broker-dealers in the U.S. securities markets.

Background information (from BrokerCheck)

Based on his BrokerCheck Report, Vincent Camarda reportedly:

• Is not currently registered with a brokerage firm.
• Has passed the Series 24, SIE, Series 7, Series 66, and Series 63 exams.
• Was previously registered with firms that include IBN Financial Services, Inc.; Traderfield Securities Inc.; and American Portfolios Financial Services, Inc.

Kurta Law Can Help

If you have worked with Vincent Camarda and you have concerns about his activity, you may be able to recover investment losses through FINRA arbitration. Kurta Law has extensive experience representing investors in FINRA arbitration and other securities matters. Our attorneys can review your account statements and other records to evaluate potential claims, including claims related to unsuitable recommendations, misrepresentations or omissions, and failures to supervise. Contact Kurta Law at 877-600-0098 or info@kurtalawfirm.com for a free consultation.

Helpful resources:  |  Unsuitable Investments  |  Stockbroker Fraud

For nearly 20 years, Kurta Law has advocated for investors and helped hold financial professionals and brokerage firms accountable. If you are concerned about a financial advisor’s recommendations or other possible misconduct, our team can help you evaluate your options and pursue recovery. Do not let potential securities fraud go unchecked. Start your recovery process today.