Kurt Charles Jackson (CRD #2913769) Has Customer Dispute Disclosures on FINRA BrokerCheck

Kurt Charles Jackson (CRD #2913769) is a broker with customer dispute disclosures on FINRA BrokerCheck. We reviewed his BrokerCheck report on June 15, 2026. It reflects six customer disputes. If you invested with Kurt Jackson and have concerns, keep reading.

BrokerCheck link: BrokerCheck

BrokerCheck report: BrokerCheck Report (PDF)

Investor Disputes / Customer Complaints

Kurt Jackson’s FINRA BrokerCheck Report reflects six customer dispute disclosures. A summary of two pending disputes is below. Four more customer dispute disclosures appear in the report.

On March 16, 2026, a claimant alleged the financial professional recommended unsuitable alternative investments through Kestra Investment Services, LLC. Kurt Jackson’s FINRA BrokerCheck report lists the product as direct investment DPP and LP interests. The claim lists $5,000 in requested damages. The arbitration is pending under FINRA case number 26-00557.

On September 3, 2025, a claimant alleged certain investments in her portfolio were unsuitable. Kurt Jackson’s FINRA BrokerCheck report lists the product as municipal debt. The claimant sought $150,000 in damages. The matter is pending under FINRA case number 25-01813.

Rule Summary #1: FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability)

FINRA Rule 2111 helps explain the suitability standard for recommendations not covered by Reg BI. It asks whether the recommendation fits the customer’s profile.

Rule Summary #2: FINRA Rule 3110 (Supervision)

FINRA Rule 3110 requires firms to supervise their associated persons. Disputes can raise questions about how a firm reviewed recommendations and account concentration.

Why This Matters to Investors (Regulation Best Interest)

Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) is a U.S. securities regulation. It strengthens the standard of conduct that broker-dealers owe to retail investors. It applies when they recommend securities transactions or investment strategies. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Reg BI. It became effective on June 30, 2020. Reg BI aims to protect investors while preserving access to brokerage products and services.

Reg BI requires broker-dealers and financial advisors to act in a retail customer’s best interest at the time of a recommendation. They must not place their own financial or other interests ahead of the customer’s. This standard is higher than the older “suitability” rule. Suitability meant a recommendation only had to be appropriate. It did not have to be the best option or free of conflicts.

Reg BI has four key obligations:

Disclosure Obligation – Broker-dealers must disclose material facts about the relationship and the recommendation. This includes fees, the scope of services, and conflicts of interest.

Care Obligation – Broker-dealers must use reasonable diligence, care, and skill. They must consider costs, risks, and alternatives when making a recommendation.

Conflict of Interest Obligation – Firms must identify conflicts of interest. They must disclose them and mitigate or eliminate them. This includes conflicts that create incentives to favor one product over another.

Compliance Obligation – Firms must maintain policies and procedures. Those policies should be designed to ensure compliance with Reg BI as a whole.

Reg BI applies to each recommendation. It is not a continuous duty like the fiduciary standard for registered investment advisers. Even so, it narrows the gap. It puts more focus on costs, conflicts, and investor-focused decision-making.

Overall, Regulation Best Interest promotes transparency. It also aims to improve the quality of investment recommendations. It is designed to reinforce trust between retail investors and broker-dealers in the U.S. securities markets.

Background Information (from BrokerCheck)

Based on his FINRA BrokerCheck report, Kurt Jackson:

Is currently registered with Commonwealth Financial Network.

Has passed the Securities Industry Essentials (SIE) exam. Kurt Jackson has also passed Series 31 and Series 7. He has also passed Series 65 and Series 63.

Was previously registered with NFP Advisor Services, LLC and UBS Financial Services Inc. He was also registered with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated.

Kurta Law Can Help

If you worked with Kurt Jackson and have concerns, Kurta Law may be able to help. A securities attorney can assess possible causes of action. The attorney can explain whether FINRA arbitration or another path may help recover losses. To speak with Kurta Law, call 877-600-0098 or email info@kurtalawfirm.com.

Helpful resources: Securities Attorney | Unsuitable Investments

For nearly 20 years, Kurta Law has advocated for investors and helped hold financial professionals accountable. Our firm represents clients nationwide in securities arbitration and related disputes. If you believe a broker or firm mishandled your account, an attorney can review the facts. The attorney can explain possible next steps.