John Paul Ledesma (CRD #2379751) Has Customer Dispute Disclosures on FINRA BrokerCheck
John Paul Ledesma (CRD #2379751) has been the subject of disclosure events, which have recently been reported on his FINRA BrokerCheck Report. According to John Paul Ledesma’s FINRA BrokerCheck report accessed on January 24, 2026, John Paul Ledesma has been the subject of three customer disputes. If you invested with John Paul Ledesma and you have concerns about his activity, keep reading.
BrokerCheck link: BrokerCheck
BrokerCheck report: BrokerCheck Report (PDF)
Investor Disputes / Customer Complaints
John Ledesma’s FINRA BrokerCheck Report reflects three customer dispute disclosures. A summary of two of the disputes is below:
On November 12, 2025. A customer alleged violations of federal securities laws, violations of the California Securities Act, violation of the Ohio Securities Act, breach of contract, common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence and gross negligence (03/2023). The product type listed on the disclosure is a real estate security. The matter is pending in a FINRA arbitration (Case #25-02476). The disclosure lists alleged damages as $0.00 and notes the claimants seek compensatory and other damages to be determined by the arbitration panel. The disclosure includes a broker statement from John Ledesma denying the allegations and stating that recommendations were made consistent with the client’s stated investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial profile.
On October 27, 2025. A customer alleged violations of federal securities laws, violations of the California Securities Act, violations of the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, breach of contract, common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence and gross negligence (03/2022). The product type listed on the disclosure is a real estate security. The matter is pending in a FINRA arbitration (Case #25-02215). The disclosure lists alleged damages as $0.00 and notes the claimant seeks compensatory and other damages to be determined by the arbitration panel. The disclosure includes a broker statement from John Ledesma denying the allegations and stating that recommendations were made consistent with the client’s stated investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial profile.
BrokerCheck also reflects one additional pending customer dispute disclosure for John Ledesma.
Rule summary #1: FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability)
FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability) requires brokers and firms to have a reasonable basis to believe a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer based on the customer’s investment profile and the facts of the recommendation.
Rule summary #2: FINRA Rule 2010
FINRA Rule 2010 is a broad, principles-based rule requiring members and associated persons to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade. FINRA frequently cites Rule 2010 in matters involving unethical conduct.
Why this Matters to Investors (Regulation Best Interest)
Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) is a U.S. securities regulation designed to strengthen the standard of conduct that broker-dealers owe to retail investors when making recommendations about securities transactions or investment strategies. Adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and effective as of June 30, 2020, Reg BI aims to enhance investor protection while preserving investor access to brokerage products and services.
Reg BI requires broker-dealers and financial advisors to act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time a recommendation is made, and not to place their own financial or other interests ahead of the customer’s. This represents a higher standard than the historical “suitability” requirement, which only required that recommendations be suitable, not necessarily optimal or conflict-free.
Reg BI is built around four key obligations:
- Disclosure Obligation – Broker-dealers must disclose material facts about the relationship and recommendations, including fees, scope of services, and conflicts of interest.
- Care Obligation – Recommendations must be made with reasonable diligence, care, and skill, considering costs, risks, and alternatives.
- Conflict of Interest Obligation – Firms must identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate conflicts, particularly those that create incentives to favor one product over another.
- Compliance Obligation – Firms must establish policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with Reg BI as a whole.
Importantly, Reg BI applies at the recommendation level, not as a continuous duty like the fiduciary standard applicable to registered investment advisers. Still, it significantly narrows the gap by emphasizing cost considerations, conflict management, and investor-focused decision-making.
Overall, Regulation Best Interest seeks to promote transparency, improve the quality of investment recommendations, and reinforce trust between retail investors and broker-dealers in the U.S. securities markets.
Background Information (from BrokerCheck)
Based on his BrokerCheck Report, John Ledesma:
Is currently registered with Emerson Equity LLC.
Has passed the Securities Industry Essentials (SIE), Series 7, Series 15, Series 3, Series 66, and Series 63 exams.
Was previously registered with firms that include Sutter Capital Partners, LLC, Capulent LLC, and Independent Financial Group, LLC.
Kurta Law Can Help
If you have worked with John Ledesma and you have concerns about his activity, Kurta Law may be able to help you evaluate potential recovery options. You may be entitled to pursue a claim through FINRA arbitration, depending on the facts of your situation and the investments involved. Contact Kurta Law at 877-600-0098 or info@kurtalawfirm.com for a free consultation.
Helpful resources: Unsuitable Investments | Stockbroker Fraud
For nearly 20 years, Kurta Law has advocated for investors and helped hold financial professionals accountable—because investors should not have to sit quietly while alleged misconduct and securities fraud go unchecked. Start your recovery process today.